Chapter 8

Evaluation of the Teacher Portfolio 

The evaluation of the Teacher Portfolio is achieved via committees established at each department with head and members of committees assigned according to the regulation of the TQA/MHE. The evaluation committee letter (Farman) should be issued before May 15th. The committees evaluate every individual teacher's portfolio electronically via the teacher’s PF&CAD site, where they asked to complete an online evaluation form and answer 19 questions. The QA directorate has the authority to assigned committee to review the evaluation committee scores of questions 14-19, only and in certain circumstances. The teacher has no right to complain on the evaluation committee scoring, but in rare circumstances. At the time we all appreciate the efforts of the evaluation committee; the scoring of the evaluation committee that evaluates the teacher portfolio which are not according to the scales written in the online evaluation form is considered questionable.

The evaluation committee members are, at least;

1. Head of the Department

2. ‌Head of Quality Assurance of College

3. An experienced lecturer

4. A senior Assistant/full professor from inside/outside the department.

5. Director of Higher Education Unit at the College

The academics who have posts, e.g., Director of QA, Director of Curriculum development, etc., their evaluation committee should be consists of the following members, at least;

1. Vice president for the scientific/administrative affairs depends on the post of the academic under evaluation.

2. Head of the academics’ department.

3. QA directorate officer.

4. Director of the University Higher Education Directorate.

١-جێگری سەرۆکی زانکۆ بۆ کارووباری زانستی /کارگێری ، ئەمەش بە پێی پۆستی ستافە ئەکادیمیە هەڵسەنگێراوەکە. 

٢- سەرۆک بەشی ستافە ئەکادیمیەکە 

٣- بەڕێوبەری بەرێوبەرایەتی دڵنیایی جۆری ٤- بەرێوەبەری هۆبەی زانستی خوێندنی باڵا لە ئاستی زانکۆ.